Skip to main content

← Air War Is Not Enough

CENTCOM seeks 'creative, unconventional' ways to punish Iran - report

The Jerusalem Post published CENTCOM seeks 'creative, unconventional' ways to punish Iran - report on August 3, 2026. Citing CNN, the paper reports that US Central Command, the American military headquarters for the Middle East, asked analysts for new ways to pressure Iran, and that one option on the table was putting American troops into Iran. An American family should care because the story says buried nuclear sites might not fall to bombs alone, and that fully eliminating them could mean US soldiers crossing into Iran. That is a reported option, with risks the article itself flags.

Background for new readers: On 28 February 2026 the United States and Israel began a joint air war on Iran. The Pentagon calls its part Operation Epic Fury; Israel calls its part Operation Roaring Lion. It came eight months after a shorter war in June 2025, when US bombers hit Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The question running through this section is whether the air war turns into American soldiers fighting on Iranian soil. This article is filed under Air War Is Not Enough; the full article index lists every article on this shelf.

Evidence rating: MODERATE. A leading Israeli paper, citing CNN and two sources familiar with military planning, reports that buried Iranian nuclear sites could require American troops to enter Iran, and that Trump has repeatedly threatened ground operations. CENTCOM's spokesman answered on the record about the email; the planning sources are not named.

What the article says​

The Post says that on the Wednesday before publication an officer in CENTCOM's intelligence branch emailed a broad group of military analysts. The officer wrote that the command was looking for new creative and unconventional ways to pressure and punish Iran. A second source told CNN, the Post says, that a senior US officer had circulated the request the week before. Military officials called the crowdsourcing-style email unusual. The second source said CENTCOM was reviewing its approach and weighing a wide range of alternatives.

Captain Timothy Hawkins, a CENTCOM spokesperson, answered that point on the record. He said the command has a long history of working in innovative ways, and that Admiral Brad Cooper asks members of the team, whatever their rank, for ways to perform at the highest level. That statement explains the email as normal leadership. It does not rule ground troops out.

The Post says the request shows the bind Trump is in. He is described as facing three hard paths: expand the air campaign, commit US troops to riskier operations on the ground, or reach an agreement that falls short of some of his original aims.

On the air path, the Post says US officials said CENTCOM had a plan for one or two weeks of heavy bombardment meant to destroy Iran's remaining missiles. Trump had not approved it. The paper says Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the president's top military adviser, had raised concern about dwindling stocks of air-defense interceptors. Other officials warned that strikes on bridges, desalination plants, and other infrastructure could cause high civilian casualties. Caine had already told lawmakers, in July, that air power has its limits.

The Post says Trump threatened renewed strikes after the email, then called off a planned attack over the weekend. Citing CNN, it says Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was among regional leaders who urged him to ease off. Trump said on Sunday that the United States and Iran were expected to resume talks on Monday about the Strait of Hormuz, the sea lane at the Gulf's mouth, and about Tehran's nuclear program. The Post says US intelligence assessments, previously reported by CNN, had concluded that the bombing campaign was unlikely by itself to change Iran's negotiating position.

The ground path is the part that names American soldiers. Two sources familiar with military planning said preparations had been made for possible strikes on Pickaxe Mountain and other sites believed to hold nuclear material or equipment. The Post then reports the limit of bombs.

Fully eliminating them could therefore require American troops to enter Iran, an option carrying far greater military and political risks.

The Jerusalem Post, August 3, 2026, citing two sources familiar with military planning, via CNN. "Them" means the underground sites the sources said may be too deep for ordinary US bombs and missiles.

The Post says Trump has repeatedly threatened ground operations. The examples it gives are seizing the strategic Kharg Island, or trying to remove Iran's highly enriched uranium. It says such action would conflict with his 2024 campaign promise not to send Americans to fight in prolonged foreign wars. It also says more ground action would put more Americans in danger. The article reports that eighteen American service members have been killed in the conflict, and that hundreds more have been wounded.

A narrower idea is also on the page. A source familiar with the planning said Trump had discussed strikes like a fireworks display, hitting sites already struck, or similar ones. The Post says that could offer a symbolic military result without destroying Iran's nuclear program, and that it would not necessarily settle the fight over the Strait of Hormuz. One source said that in the end the president will want a deal, so he will keep looking for ways to get tough and get out, and that creative thinking matters when conventional options are running out.

The third path, the Post says, is to keep the current pattern of limited strikes and Iranian retaliation while talks continue. That approach would avoid the immediate risks of a ground invasion. It could also prolong the danger to US personnel and to commercial shipping. At a Cabinet meeting on Friday, asked how the war would end, Trump said he thought the United States just wants to win, and that Washington would hit Iran very hard until Iranian leaders said they could not take it anymore.

What other reporting adds​

The email's own words. IBTimes UK, reporting the same CNN account, printed the officer's line as: "We are looking for new creative and unconventional ways to pressure and punish Iran." It added that "The country's most senior officer has publicly conceded that bombing alone cannot deliver what the president wants," quoting General Caine to lawmakers: "Air power has its limits." (IBTimes UK, 3 August 2026; research capture: twitter/t52__v623.md).

The bombing plan. A roundup the same day, citing The Hill, said CENTCOM had "prepared a large-scale operation" as a "decisive two-week bombing campaign" (research capture: twitter/t50__v600.md). That matches the "one or two weeks of heavy bombardment" in this article.

A split at the top, as one former officer described it. On 15 August, in a post built around an interview with Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Aguilar, news account Mario Nawfal wrote that "command is split: the Joint Chiefs chairman wants an off-ramp, CENTCOM wants more targets." (Mario Nawfal on X, 15 August 2026; research capture: twitter/t51__v605.md).

Senior commanders pushed back on a longer war. On 2 September, news account Mario Nawfal summarized a Washington Post report that four senior commanders had "formally non-concurred with prolonging large-scale operations against Iran": the heads of European Command, Southern Command, and Pacific Command, and the chief of naval operations. In military language, to non-concur is to put formal disagreement on the record. The post says access to a classified Pentagon record of that disagreement was then cut, and that Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell "did not dispute the removal" and "called non-concurs standard." (Mario Nawfal on X, 2 September 2026; the Post article itself was not opened; research captures: twitter/t50__v599.md, twitter/t51__v611.md).

What it shows​

Five months into a war sold as an air campaign, the command running it was asking its own analysts for "creative and unconventional" ideas, because, as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs told lawmakers, "Air power has its limits." The Jerusalem Post drew the conclusion for its readers: the underground sites bombs cannot reach mean that fully eliminating them "could therefore require American troops to enter Iran." That is the ladder this section documents: the bombing falls short, the ground options return, and the soldiers named are American, while Israel keeps its infantry home (see Air War Is Not Enough, Kharg Island and the Uranium Raid, and Israel Keeps Its Infantry Home).

Check it yourself​

Last Updated: 2026-09-26

Last updated on