Skip to main content

← Congress and the Public

Josh Hawley: 'I would hope it wouldn't come to' placing U.S. troops in Iran

On 23 March 2026, Jewish Insider published Josh Hawley: 'I would hope it wouldn't come to' placing U.S. troops in Iran, by Marc Rod. Jewish Insider is a Washington news site that covers U.S. politics and Israel. Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, told the outlet he hoped the United States would not launch a ground operation in Iran. An American family should care because the question is whether U.S. soldiers go onto Iranian soil, and the president had just given two different answers.

Evidence rating: MODERATE. The rating covers what Senator Hawley told Jewish Insider on the record, and Rod's account, drawn from the New York Times, of Trump's two answers on ground troops that week. Hawley's words show that a ground operation in Iran was a live question inside the President's own party by the war's fourth week.

What the article says​

Rod writes that the United States was deploying thousands of Marines to the Middle East. Against that backdrop, he says Trump kept sending mixed messages about a ground invasion. Asked about a ground operation in Iran, Hawley told Jewish Insider on Friday that he hoped it would not come to that.

I would hope it wouldn't come to that.

Senator Josh Hawley, to Jewish Insider, 23 March 2026, on a ground operation in Iran.

Rod writes that Hawley had already said the war should wrap up quickly, and that deploying ground troops might require an affirmative congressional war authorization. A war authorization is a vote by Congress that says the president may use force. Hawley was saying a ground step might need that vote. Rod treats the comment as a sign that a ground invasion could split Republicans who had been supporting the war.

On Trump, Rod reports two answers from the week before, both by way of the New York Times. At one point Trump said he was "not afraid" to deploy troops. Later in the week he said he did not plan to do so. This page did not open those Times stories. It reports only what Jewish Insider says they contain.

Other Republicans were not speaking with one voice. Senator Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, had said earlier that week that she wished the president would find a way to end the war, and that it was getting harder to see how. She also said, before reports of a possible 200 billion dollar supplemental request, that the funding level might "provide its own level of shock." Representative Lauren Boebert, a Colorado Republican, said she would oppose any additional funding request for the conflict.

Senator Rick Scott, a Florida Republican, took the other side. Rod writes that Scott said he was not concerned about placing troops on the ground. Scott said the president had to protect American freedom and destroy Iran's nuclear weapons and its ability to hit the United States with ballistic missiles, and that the president was doing the right thing.

What other reporting and posts add​

Trump's two answers, in his own words. On 2 March Trump told the New York Post: "Every president says, 'There will be no boots on the ground.' I don't say it." (see Trump, defense officials keep Iran operation open-ended). On 19 March, on camera: "No, I'm not putting troops anywhere. If I were, I certainly wouldn't tell you, but I'm not putting troops." USA Today video, 19 March 2026. (captures: twitter/t52__v618.md, twitter/t13__v147.md)

Where the public stood that week. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released 19 March found, as Common Dreams reported, "just 7% of US voters support the idea of a large-scale ground invasion of Iran," and "55% said they would oppose the use of any ground troops." Common Dreams, 20 March 2026. (capture: twitter/t13__v147.md) An X summary around 29 March carried a Politico line: "Republican insiders believe if we put boots on the ground in Iran the GOP will lose 60-70 seats in the House." X trend, 29 March 2026. (capture: twitter/t50__v599.md)

Other Republicans went further than Hawley. Days later, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) posted after a classified briefing: "I will not support troops on the ground in Iran. EVEN MORE SO after this briefing." @jackimaniel thread, 26 March 2026. (capture: twitter/t49__v581.md) Joe Kent, a Trump appointee who had run the National Counterterrorism Center, had resigned on 17 March, writing, as Al Majalla quoted his letter, that Iran posed "no imminent threat." Al Majalla. (capture: twitter/t12__v144.md)

What it shows​

In the war's fourth week, with thousands of Marines moving toward Iran, a Republican senator who supported the war could only say he "would hope" a ground operation would not come. Trump's answers that month show the pattern documented on No Boots on the Ground: "Every president says, 'There will be no boots on the ground.' I don't say it," and then, "If I were, I certainly wouldn't tell you." Three days before this article, CBS had reported the Pentagon's detailed preparations for a ground deployment into Iran.

Hawley's point that a ground step might need a vote of Congress names the one check that could have stopped it. As Congress and the Public shows, no ground-troop limit ever became law.

Check it yourself​

For a newcomer: the United States and Israel began bombing Iran on 28 February 2026. Josh Hawley is a Republican senator from Missouri, usually a Trump ally and a critic of long foreign wars. When a senator from the president's own party says he "would hope" ground troops are not coming, it tells a family that the question was live inside the governing party, three weeks in. An "authorization for use of military force" (AUMF) is a law Congress passes to approve a war; the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war.

Research captures: twitter/t52__v618.md, twitter/t13__v147.md, twitter/t50__v599.md, twitter/t49__v581.md, twitter/t12__v144.md

Last Updated: 2026-09-26

Last updated on