← Surveillance Tools Already Built
DARPA's Social-Media Programs: From Occupy to "False Media Assets"
Evidence rating: CONFIRMED for the program names, budgets, and quoted descriptions, drawn from DARPA's own announcements as reported by The Telegraph, The Guardian, Bloomberg, and others. STRONG for this page's reading: the Pentagon's research agency has spent fifteen years building and funding tools to detect, map, and counter messages spreading through social networks, and one of its funded studies examined an American protest movement.
Who DARPA is
DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, funds research the Pentagon expects to need. It does not usually build weapons itself; it pays universities and companies to invent them. Many of its programs are public, and their names tell you what the Pentagon wanted to be able to do.
SMISC, 2011: tracking messaging, studying Occupy
In July 2011, after uprisings in the Arab world organized on Twitter and Facebook, DARPA launched Social Media in Strategic Communication (SMISC). The Telegraph reported the goal was to track "purposeful or deceptive messaging and misinformation" in social networks and to pursue "counter messaging of detected adversary influence operations." DARPA's announcement said: "Events of strategic as well as tactical importance to our Armed Forces are increasingly taking place in social media space." "DARPA planned to spend $42 million (£25m) on the Social Media in Strategic Communication (SMISC) program, with prospective contractors asked to test algorithms through “experiments” with social media" (Telegraph, via Vatic Project, July 2011).
DARPA's own description, as archived: "The general goal of the Social Media in Strategic Communication (SMISC) program is to develop a new science of social networks built on an emerging technology base. Through the program, DARPA seeks to develop tools to help identify misinformation or deception campaigns and counter them with truthful information, reducing adversaries' ability to manipulate events" (Self Reliance Central, January 27, 2023).
In 2014, when DARPA published the list of projects it had funded, The Guardian reported: "The project list includes a study of how activists with the Occupy movement used Twitter as well as a range of research on tracking internet memes and some about understanding how influence behaviour (liking, following, retweeting) happens on a range of popular social media platforms." And: "Several of the DoD-funded studies went further than merely monitoring what users were communicating on their own, instead messaging unwitting participants in order to track and study how they responded" (The Guardian, July 8, 2014, as quoted on r/chomsky and r/TheNativeDissident).
Occupy Wall Street was an American protest movement. A Pentagon-funded study examined how its activists organized online. That is the precedent that matters for anyone who would organize against a draft.
Semantic Forensics, 2019: scanning the internet
In 2019, a DARPA request described what a report summarized as "the development of an automated system capable of scanning the entire internet and locating and censoring content deemed as 'False media assets' and 'Disinformation.'" The aim, as quoted: to "Identify, deter, and understand adversary disinformation campaigns" (r/politics summary of Kevin Reed, September 6, 2019). Bloomberg reported that DARPA would launch a project to repel "large-scale, automated disinformation attacks" with "custom software that can unearth fakes hidden among more than 500,000 stories, photos, video and audio clips" (as quoted by Sons of Liberty Media).
Defeat Disinfo, 2020: mapping talk about the president
In 2020, the Washington Post reported that a political group planned to use a tool called Defeat Disinfo, using "Artificial intelligence and network analysis to map discussion of the president's claims on social media," and to "intervene" by "identifying the most popular counter-narratives and boosting them through a network of more than 3.4 million influencers across the country — in some cases paying users with large followings to take sides against the president." The Post updated its report to say the group was "using open-source technology initially incubated with funding from DARPA." DARPA's statement: "DARPA is strictly apolitical," and "Unequivocally, DARPA funding did not help advance the technology with which Hougland now works" (The Hayride, May 31, 2020).
Whatever DARPA intended, the lesson is that tools built for "adversary" messaging were described, within a few years, as being pointed at Americans' political speech.
SocialSim, INCAS, and a Lockheed prototype
Later DARPA programs named in reporting include SocialSim (Social Simulation for Evaluating Online Messaging Campaigns) and INCAS (Influence Campaign Awareness and Sensemaking). When accused in 2021 of receiving Twitter data, a DARPA spokesperson said "Twitter has no relationship with DARPA"; its program manager said Americans' data could be collected "unintentionally" and that there were procedures "to isolate and not use that data" (Reclaim The Net, October 6, 2021). In 2024, Reclaim The Net reported: "Lockheed Martin Develops System to Identify and Counter Online “Disinformation,” Prototyped by DARPA" (@ReclaimTheNetHQ, September 6, 2024).
Why it matters for a draft
A draft that people refuse in large, organized numbers fails. Organizing today happens online. The Pentagon's research agency has funded the science of tracking messages as they spread, studied how an American protest movement used Twitter, messaged unwitting users to study their responses, and prototyped systems to find and counter what it calls disinformation. Pointed at a campaign urging young men not to report, those tools would be doing exactly what they were built to do. See how the machine closes the exits.
Sources
- Telegraph, via Vatic Project, July 2011 — SMISC, $42 million
- Self Reliance Central, January 27, 2023 — SMISC description
- The Guardian, July 8, 2014 — Occupy study; messaging unwitting participants
- r/politics, September 6, 2019 — Semantic Forensics
- Sons of Liberty Media, citing Bloomberg — 500,000 items
- The Hayride, May 31, 2020 — Defeat Disinfo
- Reclaim The Net, October 6, 2021 — SocialSim, INCAS
- @ReclaimTheNetHQ, September 6, 2024 — Lockheed prototype
Status: Curtis Hougland is alive to our knowledge; his current status was not separately confirmed. Nothing here states or implies that any named person broke any law.
Related Areas
Last Updated: 2026-09-26