Skip to main content

← Plato's Ethics on the Black Horse

Being Told Not to Look: The Voices and Pressures That Keep Parents From the Record

The black horse is inside every parent: the pull toward comfort, the wish not to know. But parents in 2026 are not left alone with it. From the first weekend of the war, a steady chorus has told them that there is nothing to see, that the questions are hoaxes or misinformation or bigotry, that they should trust the winning side, and in some cases that asking at all is a foreign influence operation. This page gathers that chorus in its own words, so a parent can recognize it. It is the outside voice that feeds the inside horse.

"Ignore conflict clickbait"​

The first message many young Americans got about the draft came with an instruction in the headline. A university newspaper's March 23, 2026 editorial was titled, in its web address, "ignore conflict clickbait: what you need to know about Iran military drafts." It quoted a professor that "there is a 100% chance there will not be a U.S. draft to Iran," because "America's not going to deploy ground troops against Iran" (Baylor Lariat, March 23, 2026). A week earlier, X's own summary of a viral mother's post had closed with "no draft exists—the last was in 1973—and recruiting is strong" (X trending summary, March 15, 2026).

Each of those is a way of saying: stop reading. Neither mentions that automatic registration had already been signed into law, to take effect "by December 2026" (SSS Strategic Plan). The pattern is older than this war. In January 2020 the Selective Service's website crashed from traffic after the Soleimani strike, and the agency blamed "the spread of misinformation" (USA Today, January 6, 2020). In 2024, "Congress called it misinformation" that automatic registration was a step toward a draft, and then passed automatic registration in December 2025 (@signaloftheeye, July 25, 2026). The word "misinformation" can close a question without answering it.

"Just use that thing between your ears"​

Some supporters of the war tell parents that reading is unnecessary. On September 20, 2026, a widely shared post addressed older Americans directly: "Many of you are old enough to be my parents or grandparents. I thought that as people get older, they're supposed to get wiser. ... God created human beings with brains, some people need to use it so we don't have to try to convince them with numbers, long ass posts, complex analysis, etc. Just use that thing between your ears so you can see what the President is doing." Its three steps: "Open your eyes and ears," "see the direction being set," and "vote for Republicans" (@aj_inapi, September 20, 2026). Its promise: the war was fought "so YOUR children and grandchildren DO NOT have to fight and die in FOREVER WARS."

Read that as a parent. It asks you to skip "numbers" and "complex analysis" and trust a direction. That is exactly what the black horse wants.

"Do you want to be on the winning team?"​

On March 4, 2026, the tech columnist Hillel Fuld, who describes himself as a "Proud Zionist/Jew" and a father of five, wrote an open letter to critics of the war. It told them: "You've been lied to your whole life. ... Lies your parents told you, your teachers told you, your friends told you, and the media told you." It said images of Israeli casualties were "all fake," that "Iran already lost this war," and ended with a question: "If morality doesn't make you open your eyes and side with the Jews ... ask yourself one thing. Do you want to be on the winning team or the losing team?" Near the close: "Sit down. Shut up. And watch how we win yet again" (@HilzFuld, March 4, 2026).

"Sit down. Shut up." A parent does not have to answer a letter like that. A parent only has to notice what kind of argument it is: not evidence, but an invitation to join the side that is winning.

"Crap like Greater Israel"​

Some voices tell parents that a whole line of evidence is off limits. In March 2026, a commentator told his large following: "I'm tired of the easily debunked conspiracy theories about Jews. Crap like 'Greater Israel'" (@mattforney, March 13, 2026). An Israeli-English outlet ran the headline "The 'Greater Israel' hoax is the most dangerous lie yet" (JNS, April 1, 2026). A post attributed to the commentator Ben Shapiro said: "When you say Israel runs American foreign policy, that's an anti-semitic conspiracy theory ... rooted in nothing" (@seethroughit2, September 16, 2026). In June 2025, during the first war, the radio host Mark Levin wrote that critics were "antisemitic podcasters, fake MAGA grifters, a bizarre congresswoman, low IQ comedian bigots" (@marklevinshow, June 17, 2025).

The answer to "it's a hoax" is not a slogan. It is the Times of Israel reporting the prime minister's "Very much" (reading item 5). The answer to "you're an antisemite" is the definition's own sentence that criticism of Israel "similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic" (Fear of the Antisemitism Label).

"Your question is a foreign operation"​

A newer move treats the question itself as enemy propaganda. In July 2026, the AI account Grok, answering a question about the killing of Charlie Kirk, said "Iran-linked networks pushed 'Israel did it' to smear a key ally and inflame antisemitism" (@grok, July 30, 2026). Critics of the war answered the general version of that charge sharply: "There is no alien foreign conspiracy ... all they have to do is use their eyes and ears and look" (@zei_squirrel, May 10, 2026). Foreign governments do run influence operations, Iran's included. A parent can hold both facts: yes, other governments try to move American opinion; no, that does not make a question about the Selective Service list or the Times of Israel a foreign operation. The documents are American and Israeli.

Governments watch American opinion closely. An Israeli government daily status report on the war, dated March 2, 2026 and titled in its file name "Roaring Lion," counted "approximately 2.32 million posts on X" about the strikes and quoted American critics, including one who wrote, "If you keep voting after they dragged us into a regional war with Iran, then you will vote for absolutely anything" (gov.il PDF, March 2, 2026). A June 2026 summary of reporting by The Intercept, based on internal Meta documents, said "Israel's gov't requested removals of posts supportive of Iran, critical…" (as reposted by @feitfor, June 21, 2026; the text is cut off in the capture).

Pressure on the press​

The pressure is not only on individuals. A journalism dean writing in March 2026 noted that "the Pentagon has restricted access for legacy news organizations," and that "on March 14, 2026, Brendan Carr, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, replied to a social media post from President Donald Trump complaining about reporting on U.S. involvement in Iran. Carr threatened to deny license renewals to broadcasters not operating in the 'public interest.'" The President's original post: "The People of our Country understand what is happening far better than the Fake News Media!" (Legal News, March 20, 2026, republishing The Conversation). When broadcasters are warned about their licenses over war coverage, parents should expect less of it on the evening news, and more reason to read primary sources themselves.

What the chorus has in common​

VoiceWhat it tells a parent
"Ignore conflict clickbait"; "no draft exists"There is nothing to read
"Just use that thing between your ears"Skip the numbers; trust the direction
"Winning team or the losing team?"Choose a side, not a source
"Crap like Greater Israel"; "antisemitic podcasters"That evidence is forbidden
"Iran-linked networks"Your question is enemy propaganda
License threats; restricted press accessExpect to hear less

Every line in the left column works on the part of a parent that wants the question closed. None of them is a document. The page The Shortest Reading List is the answer to all of them at once.

Sources​

Research captures: twitter/t10__v109.md, t10__v113.md, t10__v118.md, t10__v120.md, t72__v853.md, t72__v855.md, t72__v856.md, t72__v857.md, t72__v858.md, t73__v866.md, t73__v876.md.

Status: Hillel Fuld, Matt Forney, Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, and Brendan Carr are alive. Nothing on this page is a claim that any of them committed a crime.

Last Updated: 2026-09-26