Skip to main content

← The Phaedrus Passage

What Scholars Say the Black Horse Is: Appetite, Hubris, and the Horse That Moves First

This section uses Plato's black horse to describe the pull a parent feels to look away from a draft. It is fair to ask whether that reading is faithful to Plato. This page gathers what scholars and careful readers say the black horse actually stands for. Every reading below supports the same practical conclusion: the black horse is the part of a person that wants comfort and resists being told, and it must not be left holding the reins.

The standard reading: appetite​

The oldest and most common reading ties the three parts of the chariot to the three parts of the soul in Plato's Republic: reason, spirit, and appetite. The Joad Society's 2022 summary sets it out plainly:

  • "A rational part (the part that loves truth and knowledge, which should rule over the other parts of the soul through the use of reason). The Charioteer represents man's Reason."
  • "A spirited part (which seeks glory, honor, recognition and victory). The white horse represents man's spirit (thymos: θύμος)."
  • "An appetitive part (which desires food, drink, material wealth and sex). The black horse represents man's appetites."

— The Joad Society, May 26, 2022

The same page adds the Republic's definition of justice: the condition "in which each of these three parts does its own work, and does not interfere in the workings of the other parts." Appetite is not evil. It is simply not supposed to steer.

Reference summaries use the Greek name for this part. "The dark horse corresponds to appetites, concupiscence, and bodily desires and lusts. In Platonic psychology, this part of the soul is called the epithumetikon" (Clayton Newton, Great American Adventures, November 28, 2022). Wikipedia gives the three-part version most readers meet first: "The charioteer represents intellect, reason, or the part of the soul that must guide the soul to truth; one horse represents rational or moral impulse or the positive part of passionate nature (e.g., righteous indignation); while the other represents the soul's irrational passions, appetites, or concupiscent nature" (Wikipedia, Phaedrus).

Note the words "material wealth." A mortgage, a paycheck, a business, a pension: those are exactly the goods the appetitive part protects. When a parent says I can't afford to get involved, the appetitive part is talking.

A newer reading: hubris and shame​

In 2025, Sung-Hoon Kang of Seoul National University argued that the traditional match between the two horses and the Republic's spirit and appetite "originates with ancient Platonists," and that "there are more discrepancies than similarities." His alternative: "The white horse represents the disposition of aidōs, which produces proper motivations, while the black horse represents the disposition of hubris, which produces improper motivations" (Kang, Seoul National University journal, published August 31, 2025).

Aidōs is shame or reverence: the feeling that makes a person care what is right before anyone is watching. Hubris is overconfident pride. Kang's reading fits a war year uncomfortably well. The hubris of the black horse sounds like I already know how this ends, it will be over in three weeks, my son would never be drafted. Every one of those was said in 2026, and the calendar has tested them. See Predictions Versus the Calendar.

The horse that moves first​

Elizabeth Belfiore, in "Dancing with the Gods: The Myth of the Chariot in Plato's Phaedrus," pushes back on the idea that the black horse is simply the villain. Some scholars, she writes, say "this horse represents an ineradicable evil in the soul, being the cause of the original fall to earth as well as impeding progress as the soul attempts to return to the gods." She argues that reading "fails to account for the fact that it is always the black horse who initiates movement (254a5-6, 254d4-7)." The Scribd preview of her article says she finds the black horse "resembles a satyr, with both bestial and divine traits," and even "resembles not only a satyr but also Socrates himself" (Belfiore, Scribd preview).

The same article reports two other scholars:

  • Martha Nussbaum, who "argues that the black horse represents the independent motivational and cognitive role of emotion and appetite: The role of emotion and appetite as guides is motivational: they move the whole person towards the good."
  • G. R. F. Ferrari, "who argues that the charioteer's task is not to repress or eradicate the desires represented by the black horse but to learn from them and to integrate the whole soul by allowing these desires to find their proper place within it."

For a parent this is good news, not a complication. The desire to protect a home, a job, and peace at the table is not a moral failure. It is energy. Belfiore's point is that the black horse moves the chariot. The question is only whether it drives. A parent's love of comfort, put in its proper place, is what makes the parent want the family safe, and a family is not safe if a son's name sits on a list nobody in the house has read about.

An older chariot: Aeschylus​

Plato did not invent the image of a chariot pulled by mismatched animals. The Italian scholar Antonio Panaino, in "The Chariot and Its Antagonist Steeds," compares Plato's Phaedrus 246a–b with lines 171 to 200 of Aeschylus's play The Persians (Panaino's paper is hosted by Ca' Foscari University of Venice; the capture of it for this investigation did not include a stable link). The point for a parent is simple: the picture of a team of mismatched animals that a driver must hold together was already an old way, in Plato's own time, of talking about self-rule, for a person and for a people.

A modern echo: Freud's rider​

The same picture turns up in modern psychology. A February 2026 Threads post summarized Freud's version: "Freud compared the Ego to a rider on an unruly horse. The horse is the Id: wild, powerful, and reckless. The rider tries to steer using the Reality Principle, balancing desire against social norms. Sometimes the rider controls the horse. Sometimes the horse wins" (@bigbrainpsyche, Threads, February 22, 2026). Plato said it 2,400 years earlier: the horse does not stop wanting, so the rider cannot stop steering.

Some readers swap the horses. Read the text.​

Popular summaries are not always careful. A widely shared 2026 post on the chariot says in one sentence that "the black horse represents our logic, while the white horse represents our emotions," and in the next that the black horse "represents our animalistic nature, drawing us towards physical pleasures and materialism" (@HomerPavlos, May 29, 2026). Both cannot be right, and the second matches Plato. That is a small lesson in itself: even a summary of Plato needs to be checked against Plato. The same habit is what this section asks a parent to use on news about the war. See the two horses, line by line.

What every reading agrees on​

ReadingWhat the black horse isWhat it means for a parent
Traditional (Republic)Appetite: food, drink, wealth, comfortComfort must not decide whether you read the law
Kang (2025)Hubris, overconfidence"My son would never be drafted" is the black horse talking
Belfiore, Nussbaum, FerrariA necessary energy that moves the soulLove of home is good; put it to work protecting your child
Nightingale (via 2012 thesis)A talker that bargains and delays"Later" is how the black horse wins

However a scholar reads it, the black horse is never the part that should hold the reins.

Sources​

Research captures: twitter/t09__v097.md, t09__v099.md, t70__v829.md, t70__v830.md, t70__v831.md, t70__v832.md, t70__v836.md, t70__v839.md.

Last Updated: 2026-09-26

Last updated on