Skip to main content

← Did Congress Authorize It?

The June 2025 Strikes Without a Vote

On the night of June 21 to 22, 2025, American B-2 bombers dropped 30,000-pound bunker-busters on Iran's Fordow enrichment site and struck Natanz and Isfahan in what the Pentagon called Operation Midnight Hammer. It was an act of war against a sovereign country. No member of Congress voted for it. This page lays out the law, the week before, the justification offered afterward, and why it does not hold.

The law​

The Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11: only Congress has the power "to declare War." The War Powers Resolution, 50 U.S.C. 1541(c), says the President may introduce U.S. armed forces into hostilities "only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces" (text as quoted in a captured legal analysis). Section 5(b) of the same law limits action without approval to 60 days, plus 30 for withdrawal. The President must notify Congress within 48 hours.

In June 2025 there was no declaration of war, no statute authorizing force against Iran, and no Iranian attack on the United States. Iran had not attacked America; Israel had attacked Iran on June 13.

The week before​

  • June 13. Israel attacks. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran" (White House on X).
  • June 17. Massie and Khanna introduce their war powers resolution: "The ongoing war between Israel and Iran is not our war." Khanna: "No president should be able to bypass Congress's constitutional authority over matters of war." (Massie press release).
  • June 18. Senators split on camera. Rand Paul (R-Ky.): "The Constitution is very clear that no president can bomb another country or begin a war with the country without the permission of Congress." Chris Murphy (D-Conn.): "The president can't undertake military action without a vote of Congress." Jim Banks (R-Ind.): "I trust President Trump. He's the commander in chief. He'll decide what role we play." The same week AIPAC was pressing House Democrats to declare they "stand with Israel" (Drop Site News, June 18, 2025; see the Stand With Israel campaign).
  • June 21 to 22. The United States strikes. The House never voted on Massie-Khanna.

The justification offered, and the statute​

Defenders of the strikes made two arguments. Commentator M.A. Rothman, the day after: "He followed the War Powers Act. Congress got the 48-hour heads-up. And FYI: the 2001 AUMF still covers action against state-sponsored terror. Iran's IRGC is officially designated as such." And: "Congress? Notified within 48 hours (Reuters, June 22, 2025). AUMFs? Still in place—just like Obama and Biden used." (Rothman on X, June 23, 2025; second post).

Set those claims beside the record:

  • The 2001 AUMF authorizes force against those responsible for the September 11 attacks. Iran was not among them. A March 2026 analysis of the June strikes found "no AUMF was invoked," and concluded they "likely violated the Constitution because they initiated significant hostilities against a sovereign state without Congressional authorization" (Grok analysis shared on X, March 8, 2026). Section 1541(c) lists only three routes to hostilities; notification is not one of them.
  • The notice. A review on the morning of June 23, 2025 found "no public indication" yet that Congress had been formally notified (Grok analysis shared on X, June 22 to 23, 2025). The administration's account, as later summarized, was that it notified Congress after the strike, "once planes were safely out of Iranian airspace." A notice after the fact is not consent. Even a pro-administration summary the next day listed the strikes as one of eleven U.S. military actions taken "without a prior congressional vote," noting they "await War Powers Resolution justification" (Grok on X, June 24, 2025).
  • "Just like Obama and Biden." A list of presidents who acted without Congress (Korea, Grenada, Panama, Kosovo, Libya 2011, Syria) is an argument that the Constitution has been ignored before, not that it was obeyed this time.

What Congress did next​

  • June 24, 2025. Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, asked what she wanted to hear from the members' briefing: "The truth." She said "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon" but that the President should have come to Congress, where he might have won support, and recalled that she opposed the Iraq war because the intelligence "didn't support the threat." The members' briefing was then cancelled (Cassie Semyon on X, June 24, 2025).
  • June 27, 2025. The Senate rejected Sen. Tim Kaine's war powers resolution 47 to 53. Rand Paul was the only Republican yes; John Fetterman the only Democrat no (CBS News; CNN).
  • A lawsuit, Smith v. Trump, No. 25-cv-03602 (D.D.C. 2025), is named in one captured legal analysis; its status was not captured.

The precedent from 2020​

Massie had fought this fight before. In January 2020, after the killing of General Qassem Soleimani, the House voted on a resolution restating "that President Trump cannot go to war with Iran without an act of Congress." "There were only three Republicans who voted for that," Massie recalled; the President called him beforehand to argue that an open threat would let him "bluff Iran" (Sense Receptor on X, May 27, 2026). Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) wrote then: "Americans don't want a new generation of young people who see family, friends & neighbors sacrificed to another disastrous foreign war with no end in sight. Trump has no authorization for war with Iran. Period." (McGovern on X, January 6, 2020). Five years later, the war came, and there still was no authorization.

Status: Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna, Rand Paul, Chris Murphy, Jim Banks, Marco Rubio, M.A. Rothman, Nancy Pelosi, Tim Kaine, John Fetterman, and Jim McGovern are alive.

Sources​

Last Updated: 2026-09-26

Last updated on