Skip to main content

< Back to Main List

Dominion Voting Systems

Canadian-founded voting technology company whose machines were used in 28 U.S. states during the 2020 election. At the center of the most contested election integrity debate in modern American history — accused of enabling systematic vote manipulation, foreign interference, and algorithmic vote shifting. The company aggressively denied all allegations and won a $787.5 million settlement from Fox News.

FieldDetails
Full NameDominion Voting Systems (now Liberty Vote)
TypeVoting Machine / Election Technology Company
Founded2002, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
HeadquartersDenver, Colorado (U.S. operations); Toronto, Ontario (founding)
International OfficesBelgrade, Serbia (software development)
Used In28 U.S. states and Puerto Rico as of 2020
Key Elections2020 U.S. Presidential, 2022 Midterms
Ownership HistoryFounded by John Poulos → Staple Street Capital (2018) → Liberty Vote / Scott Leiendecker (October 2025)
Evidence RatingDEBATED

Overview​

Dominion Voting Systems was founded in 2002 in Toronto, Canada by John Poulos. The company grew rapidly through two major acquisitions in 2010: Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems) and Sequoia Voting Systems. The Sequoia acquisition is notable because Sequoia was previously owned by Smartmatic (2005–2007), a Venezuelan-linked voting technology firm, until the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) ordered Smartmatic to divest.

In 2018, Dominion was acquired by Staple Street Capital, a private equity firm. The company maintained software development offices in Belgrade, Serbia, which became a focal point for foreign interference claims.

By 2020, Dominion machines were used in approximately 28 states. After the 2020 election, the company became the most scrutinized voting technology vendor in U.S. history.

In October 2025, Dominion was sold to Liberty Vote, a company run by Scott Leiendecker, a former Republican election official from St. Louis who served as the Republican director for the St. Louis City Board of Elections.

International Scope: Canada, South Korea, and 100+ Countries​

According to @TheSCIF (April 9, 2026 — 1,470 likes, 746 retweets, 12,830 views): "Fraud with Dominion and other associated election companies isn't limited only to the United States. The same thing that happened in the U.S. 2020 election also happened in Canada, South Korea, and 100+ other countries around the world."

This is one of the most expansive allegations against Dominion and associated voting technology companies — that the pattern of alleged vote switching documented in the U.S. was not unique to America but was a coordinated international phenomenon affecting over 100 countries simultaneously.

Documented international connections:

  • Dominion was founded in Canada (Toronto, 2002) and maintained Canadian corporate presence throughout its history
  • The Smartmatic company that formerly owned Sequoia (which Dominion later acquired) was used in Venezuelan elections and operates in multiple Latin American countries
  • Smartmatic also operated in the Philippines (2010–2022) and has contracts across Southeast Asia, including South Korea

What is and isn't verified: The claim that the same vote-switching pattern appeared in Canada, South Korea, and 100+ other countries has not been independently audited or verified by court proceedings in those jurisdictions. The allegation is presented here as claimed by @TheSCIF; it represents an extrapolation from the U.S. forensic audit findings applied globally. South Korea's 2020 parliamentary election did draw controversy from domestic election integrity advocates, but the specific Dominion connection is not established by public court record.

Why this matters if true: If Dominion-linked systems were used as a coordinated vote-shifting mechanism across 100+ countries, it would represent one of the largest election integrity operations in history — not a domestic U.S. controversy but a global infrastructure for election outcome control.

<video controls style={{width: '100%', maxWidth: '720px', height: 'auto', display: 'block'}}>

Your browser does not support the video tag.

Antrim County ballot-switching in context: 47 more Michigan counties reportedly found switching votes, always toward Democrats; same Dominion-linked pattern alleged in Canada, South Korea, and 100+ countries. Source: @TheSCIF on X, April 9, 2026. (1,470 likes, 746 retweets, 12,830 views)

ICX Machine: Marks Ballots After Voter Contact​

According to @TheSCIF (April 9, 2026 — 1,278 likes, 623 retweets, 22,765 views), the Dominion Image Cast Evolution (ICX) machine — a combined ballot marking device and optical scanner used in six swing states by 2020 — has the physical ability to mark votes onto a ballot after the last time the voter handles it. The machine can be programmed to mimic a human hand-filling a bubble, making the alteration visually indistinguishable from a genuine voter selection.

Computer science Professor Andrew Appell of Princeton University has documented this capability:

"If the machine is hacked, then they can install software that marks votes on the ballot after the voter lasts. And if the piece of paper can be marked by the computer after the last time the voter saw it and the whole paper trail is compromised."

In Georgia, the reversal rate on ICX tabulators was documented at 15–20% — far above expected operational failure rates. Each reversal sends the ballot back through the machine, which critics contend provides an opportunity for the machine to mark it on the re-feed pass.

The ICX vulnerability is most dangerous when combined with the adjudication abuse mechanism:

  • Machine generates high error rates
  • Ballots flood into adjudication
  • Human operators change selections in bulk with no audit trail
  • Paper ballot (possibly machine-marked) is now the "official" record

@TheSCIF describes this combination as "the perfect combination to rig and steal an election" and notes this is "just ONE method of FRAUD" that was allegedly employed in 2020.

Full analysis: Dominion ICX Ballot Marking

Source: @TheSCIF on X — ICX marks ballots after voter; adjudication abuse mechanism, April 9, 2026.

Georgia Legislative Testimony — Built-in Backdoor Allegation (Mark Cook)​

Election and cyber-security expert Mark Cook allegedly testified before the Georgia House Governmental Affairs Committee claiming Dominion systems contain built-in backdoors enabling vote manipulation that is designed to be untraceable. A video shared by @Real_RobN on April 8, 2026 purports to show the Georgia House Governmental Affairs Committee censoring approximately 10 seconds of his testimony mid-sentence — cutting out the specific technical details of the backdoor mechanism.

Cook's reported statement on the censored portion:

"That allow flipping changing the votes infiltrating the system all built in, set up in a way that makes it easy and untraceable."

He also reportedly stated: "I can demonstrate this to you even while I am here in this building. The testing labs all missed this and they're blindly certified."

Attribution: Sourced from @Real_RobN social media video (April 8, 2026). Cook's technical claims have not been confirmed by independent forensic examination, court admission, or official investigation as of April 8, 2026. The date of the original committee testimony is not specified in the source. Dominion has denied all backdoor allegations. The censorship claim has not been confirmed by official committee records.

Source: @Real_RobN on X — Mark Cook Georgia testimony, April 8, 2026.

Full documentation: Mark Cook | Georgia.

Forensic Audit Overview: Three-Part Steal Mechanism​

According to @TheSCIF (April 9, 2026 — 73 likes, 24 retweets, 1,084 views), forensic audits of electronic voting machines documented a three-part mechanism designed to produce manipulable election results without detection:

Part 1 — Remotely Accessible Backdoors. Machines were allegedly designed with built-in remote access capabilities that allow operators outside the voting venue to connect to the system during or after the election. This matches the backdoor claims in Mark Cook's Georgia testimony (below) and the connectivity concerns raised about Dominion's Serbian software development office.

Part 2 — Engineered Error Generation. Machines were designed to generate errors at a rate far above operational norms, triggering the ballot adjudication process. The Antrim County forensic audit documented a 68.05% error rate, and Georgia reported 15–20% reversal rates on ICX tabulators — rates that critics describe as implausibly high for normal operations.

Part 3 — Adjudication as the Manipulation Point. Once in adjudication, ballots can be manually changed by human operators at the click of a button with no meaningful audit trail. The combination of machine-generated errors + adjudication produces a pipeline through which votes can be altered while maintaining legal plausibility — the human operator made the decision, and the paper trail shows a legitimate adjudication process.

@TheSCIF frames this mechanism as evidence that the 2020 election was stolen, and places it in a broader geopolitical context: "The only thing standing in between the global elites trying to takeover and conduct regime change operations in multiple countries is the Trump administration and YOU." He characterizes election integrity as "the NUMBER 1 issue" because losing future elections to this mechanism would be irreversible.

Attribution: This is @TheSCIF's summary claim synthesizing multiple forensic audit findings. The backdoor and adjudication mechanisms are documented in other sources cited in this file (ASOG audit, Mark Cook testimony, Princeton professor Andrew Appell). The claim that these three elements constitute an intentional, coordinated design rather than independent vulnerabilities has not been adjudicated in court. Dominion denies all allegations.

<video controls style={{width: '100%', maxWidth: '720px', height: 'auto', display: 'block'}}>

Your browser does not support the video tag.

Forensic audit overview: 2020 election stolen via voting machine backdoors, engineered errors, and adjudication manipulation. Source: @TheSCIF on X, April 9, 2026.

$400 Million from Swiss Investment Bank with China Ties​

According to a video shared by @17QStorm (sourced to @TheSCIF), approximately one month before the November 2020 election, the parent company of Dominion Voting Systems allegedly received $400 million from an investment bank in Switzerland reported to have ties to China.

This claim has not been independently verified in court filings or major reporting. It is referenced in the context of the ASOG forensic audit report. If accurate, it would represent a significant foreign financial relationship in the final weeks before the election. The identity of the specific Swiss investment bank and the nature of its China ties are not specified in the video.

This overlaps with the documented concern that Staple Street Capital — which acquired Dominion in 2018 — had a UBS investment stake, and that UBS is a Swiss bank. Whether the $400M claim refers to Staple Street/UBS activity has not been confirmed. See China & Dominion: Supply Chain Allegations for the broader foreign investment context.

Source: @17QStorm on X, April 8, 2026 (video transcription); original source attributed to @TheSCIF.

Allegations of Foreign Interference​

According to claims circulated by attorneys Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani, and later amplified by @TheSCIF and other accounts:

  • Dominion's voting machines were allegedly connected to foreign systems across the globe during the 2020 election
  • The company's software development office in Belgrade, Serbia raised concerns about foreign access to U.S. election software
  • Dominion's acquisition of Sequoia Voting Systems — which had previously been owned by Smartmatic, a company with Venezuelan origins — created a chain of foreign custody over core voting technology
  • CFIUS had previously forced Smartmatic to divest from Sequoia due to foreign ownership concerns, suggesting U.S. intelligence recognized the national security risk of foreign-controlled voting technology

The Sequoia–Smartmatic Connection​

The chain of custody is documented:

  1. Smartmatic was founded in Florida in 2000 but had Venezuelan ties — its technology was used in Venezuela's 2004 recall referendum
  2. Smartmatic acquired Sequoia Voting Systems in March 2005
  3. In November 2007, CFIUS ordered Smartmatic to sell Sequoia due to foreign investment concerns
  4. Smartmatic sold Sequoia in November 2007
  5. Dominion acquired Sequoia in June 2010

Critics argue that foreign-developed code or backdoors could have persisted through these ownership changes. Dominion and defenders state that ownership changes do not carry over software vulnerabilities and that the machines were independently tested and certified.

Statistical Analysis: The 1.55% Vote Shift​

Ben Turner, a former chief actuary at Texas Mutual Workers' Compensation Insurance and owner of Fraud Spotters consulting firm, conducted a statistical analysis of Dominion's impact on election results.

Methodology​

Turner compared county-by-county election results between 2008 and 2020, measuring whether adoption of Dominion voting machines correlated with changes in vote totals. He controlled for:

  • County population and number of votes cast
  • Urban/rural population split
  • Population growth and international immigration rate
  • Education levels, "creative class" population, and manufacturing dependency
  • Race, age, and voter preference (added in subsequent iterations)

Data Sources​

  • Prior election data from MIT Election Data Science Lab
  • Current election data from Politico
  • Dominion adoption data from VerifiedVoting.org
  • Demographic data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture

Findings​

  • Counties using Dominion machines showed a 1.55 percentage point decrease in Republican votes and a 1.55 percentage point increase in Democratic votes
  • The effect persisted and strengthened when additional control variables were added
  • With all controls applied, the total shift was approximately 2.84 percentage points (combining both directions)
  • Two unnamed university statisticians reportedly validated Turner's methodology but declined to have their names published

Limitations and Counterarguments​

  • The Washington Post reported that swing-state counties using Dominion mostly voted for Trump, complicating the narrative
  • Correlation between Dominion adoption and vote shifts does not prove causation — counties that adopted Dominion may differ systematically in ways not captured by Turner's controls
  • CISA stated there is "no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised"
  • Hand recounts in Georgia and Wisconsin confirmed Dominion machines accurately tabulated votes in those states

Key Evidence Cited by Critics​

  • Antrim County, Michigan: ASOG forensic audit reported a 68.05% error rate on Dominion machines — far exceeding FEC guidelines. The audit's full conclusion stated:

    "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that the Dominion Voting System should NOT be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified." — Allied Security Operations Group, ASOG Forensic Audit Report, December 13, 2020

    See 2020 Antrim County Michigan audit for full details.

  • Serbian Development Office: Dominion maintained software development operations in Belgrade, Serbia, raising concerns about foreign access to election software source code

  • Sequoia–Smartmatic Chain of Custody: The documented foreign ownership chain prior to Dominion's acquisition

  • Ben Turner Statistical Analysis: 1.55% vote shift correlated with Dominion adoption across counties nationwide

  • CFIUS Intervention: The U.S. government's own Committee on Foreign Investment forced Smartmatic to divest from Sequoia, demonstrating official recognition of the foreign ownership risk

The Official Response​

Dominion's Position​

Dominion has categorically denied all allegations of vote manipulation, foreign interference, and algorithmic vote shifting. The company states:

  • Its machines are tested and certified by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC)
  • The company has no ownership ties to any foreign government
  • Hand recounts confirmed its machines counted accurately
  • The Antrim County error was caused by human error (failure to update software), not machine malfunction

Government Position​

  • CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) stated the 2020 election was "the most secure in American history"
  • The Director of National Intelligence reported in March 2021 there were "no indications that any foreign actor attempted to alter any technical aspect of the voting process"
  • Multiple courts dismissed election fraud lawsuits, though critics note most were dismissed on standing or procedural grounds rather than evidentiary review

Defamation Litigation​

Dominion filed defamation lawsuits against multiple parties:

  • Fox News: Settled for $787.5 million in April 2023 — one of the largest media defamation settlements in U.S. history
  • Sidney Powell: Settled for undisclosed amount
  • Rudy Giuliani: Giuliani was found liable; $148 million judgment
  • Mike Lindell / MyPillow: Lawsuit proceeded
  • Newsmax: Settled during trial for $40 million (reported)

Critics argue the defamation suits function as "lawfare" — using the cost of litigation to silence election integrity investigators and create a chilling effect on future scrutiny of voting machines.

What Was Never Independently Examined​

  • No neutral, bipartisan forensic audit of Dominion's source code was conducted and made public
  • The Serbian development office's access controls and personnel vetting were not independently audited
  • Turner's 1.55% statistical finding was never formally investigated by any government agency
  • The full chain of code custody from Sequoia (post-Smartmatic) through Dominion acquisition was not independently traced
  • CISA's declaration of election security was issued before any forensic audits were completed

Timeline​

  • 2002 — Dominion Voting Systems founded in Toronto, Canada by John Poulos
  • March 2005 — Smartmatic acquires Sequoia Voting Systems
  • November 2007 — CFIUS orders Smartmatic to divest from Sequoia (foreign ownership concern)
  • May 2010 — Dominion acquires Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold)
  • June 2010 — Dominion acquires Sequoia Voting Systems
  • 2018 — Staple Street Capital acquires Dominion
  • September 2019 — Dominion assigns security interests in 18 of its election technology patents to HSBC Bank Canada (as collateral agent), documented in USPTO records. @TheSCIF (April 8, 2026) characterizes the recipient as ICBC (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China); USPTO records indicate HSBC Bank Canada. See China & Dominion: Supply Chain Allegations.
  • October 2020 — Alleged: Dominion's parent company received $400M from a Swiss investment bank with reported China ties (per @17QStorm/@TheSCIF video, April 8, 2026; unverified)
  • November 3, 2020 — 2020 Presidential Election; Dominion machines used in 28 states
  • November 2020 — Antrim County, MI vote-flip error discovered; allegations begin
  • December 2020 — ASOG forensic audit of Antrim County Dominion machines reports 68% error rate
  • December 2020 — Ben Turner publishes Fraud Spotters analysis showing 1.55% vote shift
  • 2021–2023 — Dominion files defamation lawsuits against Fox News, Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, others
  • April 2023 — Fox News settles with Dominion for $787.5 million
  • October 2025 — Dominion sold to Liberty Vote, run by former Republican election official Scott Leiendecker

Related State / County Pages​

  • Georgia — Fulton County and statewide investigation hub (Dominion machines used statewide; hand recount conducted)
  • Michigan — 2020 fraud allegations across the state (Antrim County Dominion audit; Barry County Sheriff Dar Leaf)
  • Pennsylvania — Statewide 2020 election integrity investigation hub (Dominion machines used in key counties)
  • Arizona — Statewide 2020 election integrity investigation hub (Dominion machines used; Maricopa County controversies)
  • FBI — Federal investigation patterns and election fraud referrals
  • DNI — Director of National Intelligence reports on foreign interference in elections

Other Coverage Worth Reading​

  • Adjudication — Vote Changing at the Click of a Button: The process at the heart of Dominion-linked fraud allegations — bulk ballot changes at the click of a button, no audit trail, election clerk admitted it on camera.
  • Sharpie Voting: Maricopa County Sharpie scheme routes Republican ballots to the same adjudication queue that Dominion machines are allegedly engineered to flood.
  • 2020 Antrim County Michigan: Court-ordered forensic audit found 68% error rate and missing adjudication logs on Dominion machines.
  • Clint Curtis: Programmer testified under oath he was asked to build undetectable vote-flipping software for a Florida congressman.
  • Tom Feeney: The Florida Speaker who allegedly commissioned vote-rigging software — pattern of politician-vendor collusion.
  • Raymond Lemme: Florida investigator found dead while investigating election fraud claims — the cost of asking questions.

Sources​

Last Updated: 2026-04-09 — Added Eric Coomer cross-link to Related Cases. Prior: Added "Forensic Audit Overview: Three-Part Steal Mechanism" section from @TheSCIF post 2042292798909505923.

This information was compiled by Claude AI research.