Skip to main content

< Back to Consciousness & Deep State | Main Deep State Project

Other Dimensions / UAP / Religious

Non-solid UAP phenomena (light orbs, plasma) are interdimensional entities crossing between dimensions — and ancient religious accounts of angels, demons, and spirits may be early documentation of the same phenomenon.

FieldDetails
ThesisOther Dimensions / UAP / Religious
TypeInterdimensional / Composite
Core ClaimPhysics has multiple dimensions beyond the four we experience. Certain UAP phenomena — particularly non-solid manifestations (light orbs, plasma, luminous objects) — are entities or craft crossing between dimensions. Ancient religious encounters with angels, demons, and spirits are early human documentation of the same interdimensional contact. Some of these entities are benevolent; some are malevolent.
Key Evidence TypesUAP sensor data and military encounters (non-solid phenomena), physics theories on extra dimensions, religious and mythological texts, researcher testimony, experiential reports
Evidence StrengthEMERGING
Key FiguresJacques Vallee, John Keel, Hal Puthoff, Tom DeLonge, Diana Pasulka, Gary Nolan

Overview

This thesis bridges three domains — physics, UAP research, and religious tradition — into a unified framework:

The physics layer: Modern physics (string theory, M-theory, Kaluza-Klein theory) proposes that reality may contain 10, 11, or more dimensions beyond the four (3 spatial + time) we directly experience. Most of these extra dimensions are theorized to be compactified or otherwise inaccessible to ordinary perception. But what if they are not empty? What if consciousness or entities exist in those dimensions and can, under certain conditions, interact with ours?

The UAP layer: Not all UAPs are the same. Some appear to be hard-shell physical craft — metallic, structured, leaving radar signatures consistent with solid objects. This thesis is not about those. This thesis focuses on the other kind of UAP:

  • Light orbs — luminous spheres with no visible structure, often exhibiting intelligent behavior (responding to observers, moving in formation, splitting and merging)
  • Plasma formations — non-solid luminous phenomena that appear to phase in and out of visibility
  • Translucent or transparent objects — UAPs that appear partially materialized, as if not fully "in" our dimension
  • Objects that appear and disappear — not moving away at speed, but seeming to enter and exit our dimensional space

These non-solid UAPs behave as if they are crossing a dimensional boundary — entering our dimension, interacting briefly, then departing to a dimension we cannot perceive. They do not behave like physical craft traveling through space. They behave like something stepping between worlds.

The religious layer: If interdimensional entities have been visiting our dimension throughout human history, then ancient and medieval accounts of supernatural beings may be early documentation of the same phenomenon:

  • Angels — benevolent interdimensional entities that appeared to humans as beings of light
  • Demons / djinn / malevolent spirits — hostile interdimensional entities that interacted with humans in destructive ways
  • Visions and theophanies — Ezekiel's "wheel within a wheel," the burning bush, the pillar of fire — descriptions that sound like interdimensional phenomena described in pre-scientific language
  • The "war in heaven" — religious accounts of conflict between good and evil spiritual forces may describe actual interdimensional conflict between factions of these entities

The key insight: religion may not be mythology — it may be measurement. Ancient people encountered the same interdimensional phenomena we now detect on radar and infrared sensors. They documented what they saw using the language and frameworks available to them. The beings they called angels and demons may be the same entities we now photograph as light orbs and plasma formations.

Good and bad actors: Both religious tradition and modern UAP research report that these entities are not uniformly benevolent or malevolent. Some appear helpful, protective, or communicative. Others appear hostile, deceptive, or predatory. This maps directly onto religious frameworks that describe a cosmic struggle between good and evil forces — but viewed through a dimensional physics lens rather than a purely theological one.

Evidence & Documentation

UAP / Observational Data

  • Military encounters with non-solid luminous UAPs (distinct from structured craft encounters)
  • Sensor data showing objects appearing and disappearing without conventional departure trajectories
  • Historical reports of "foo fighters" (WWII) — luminous spheres that followed aircraft
  • The Hessdalen lights (Norway) — decades of documented luminous phenomena studied by scientists
  • Skinwalker Ranch investigations — documented non-solid luminous phenomena alongside other anomalies
  • Navy pilot encounters with objects that appeared to phase in and out of visibility

Physics / Theoretical

  • String theory and M-theory propose 10-11 dimensions
  • Kaluza-Klein theory (1921) — extra dimensions as explanation for fundamental forces
  • Hal Puthoff's work on advanced propulsion and the connection between physics and UAP phenomena
  • Eric Davis's theoretical work on traversable wormholes and dimensional transit

Historical / Religious Texts

  • Ezekiel 1 — "wheel within a wheel" covered in eyes, accompanied by beings of light
  • Genesis 6 — "sons of God" interacting with humans (interdimensional contact?)
  • Exodus — pillar of fire, burning bush (luminous non-solid phenomena)
  • Islamic tradition — djinn described as beings of "smokeless fire" (plasma?)
  • Hindu tradition — devas and asuras, beings from other realms interacting with the physical world
  • Fairy folklore across cultures — beings that appear and disappear, exist in a parallel realm, and range from helpful to dangerous

Researcher Testimony

  • Jacques Vallee — Pioneered the interdimensional hypothesis for UAPs in Passport to Magonia (1969) and Dimensions (1988). Argued that UAP phenomena share features with historical accounts of fairies, angels, and demons.
  • John KeelThe Mothman Prophecies (1975), Operation Trojan Horse (1970) — argued that UAPs are interdimensional, not extraterrestrial, and that the same phenomena have been documented throughout religious history.
  • Diana PasulkaAmerican Cosmic (2019) — Professor of Religious Studies who documents the convergence of UAP research and religious experience.

Key Figures & Researchers

  • Jacques Vallee, PhD — Computer scientist and UAP researcher; developed the interdimensional hypothesis. Author of Passport to Magonia, Dimensions, Forbidden Science. Pioneered the argument that UAPs are not extraterrestrial but interdimensional, sharing features with historical fairy, angel, and demon encounters
  • John Keel — Investigative journalist; argued UAPs are ultraterrestrial/interdimensional, not extraterrestrial. Operation Trojan Horse (1970) documented the same phenomena across religious history
  • Hal Puthoff, PhD — Physicist who directed the CIA's remote viewing program (Project Stargate) and researches advanced physics relevant to UAP propulsion and dimensionality
  • Diana Pasulka, PhD — Professor of Religious Studies at UNC Wilmington; American Cosmic (2019) and Encounters (2023) document how UAP contact parallels religious experience and may be forming a new religion. Academic bridge between religious studies and UAP research
  • Gary Nolan, PhD — Stanford immunologist researching biological effects of UAP encounters
  • Tom DeLonge — Musician and UAP researcher; Sekret Machines series explores interdimensional aspects of the UAP phenomenon
  • Eric Davis, PhD — Physicist researching traversable wormholes and dimensional transit; briefed Congress on UAP
  • Jordan Crowder — Interprets many UAP phenomena as consciousness-based projections, future-human time travelers, or interdimensional orbs. Links UAP to Gateway experiences at Monroe Institute where he encountered NHI/orbs, shadow beings, and a 7-ft shifting Bigfoot figure during sessions

What Podcasters & Researchers Say (2017–Present)

To be populated via web search research. Focus on:

  • UAP researchers discussing non-solid phenomena and interdimensional hypotheses
  • Religious scholars connecting UAP data to theological frameworks
  • Physicists discussing extra dimensions in the context of UAP
  • Podcasts: Joe Rogan, Lex Fridman, That UFO Podcast, Theories of Everything, Mysterious Universe

Competing Interpretations

  • DMT and Consciousness Travel — Proposes that humans can access these other dimensions directly through DMT, without needing UAP contact as intermediary. DMT entity encounters mirror UAP abduction reports — suggesting the same entities and dimensions accessed through different methods
  • Bible / Religion (Classical) — Accepts the reality of angels and demons but frames them theologically rather than as interdimensional entities described by physics. This thesis argues religion may be measurement — early documentation of the same interdimensional phenomena
  • Gateway / Consciousness Simulator — Maps the non-physical realm from the inside via OBE/Gateway, while this thesis observes visitors from the outside via sensor data and historical accounts. Jordan Crowder synthesizes both: his Monroe Institute sessions produced NHI encounters (orbs, shadow beings) consistent with interdimensional UAP observations, while his Gateway practice maps the territory those entities come from
  • NDE / Afterlife Research — NDE experiencers encounter beings of light and non-physical entities consistent with what this thesis documents as interdimensional visitors. NDEs may be involuntary dimensional crossings — the same phenomenon observed by UAP witnesses from the outside

Criticisms & Counter-Arguments

  • No empirical proof of extra dimensions — String theory and M-theory remain unverified; extra dimensions are mathematical constructs, not observed phenomena
  • Cherry-picking religious texts — Selectively reinterpreting ancient texts through a modern UAP lens is speculative; the original authors meant something different
  • Light orbs may have natural explanations — Ball lightning, atmospheric plasma, piezoelectric effects from tectonic stress, and other natural phenomena can produce luminous aerial objects
  • Category error — Conflating UAP sensor data with religious mythology may produce a framework that explains neither well
  • Unfalsifiable — If interdimensional entities can appear and disappear at will, the theory is difficult to test or disprove
  • Extraterrestrial hypothesis — Many UAP researchers argue the phenomena are better explained by physical craft from other star systems, not interdimensional transit

Connection to Deep State / Consciousness Control

  • If interdimensional entities are real and have been interacting with humanity throughout history, this would be among the most consequential facts ever suppressed by governments
  • Government UAP programs (AATIP, AAWSAP) investigated phenomena at Skinwalker Ranch that included non-solid luminous objects — results remain largely classified
  • The deliberate conflation of all UAP phenomena into one category ("UFOs = alien spacecraft") may be a form of information control — by framing everything as extraterrestrial, the interdimensional hypothesis is marginalized
  • Jacques Vallee has argued that government disinformation campaigns deliberately muddy the waters around UAP phenomena to prevent serious investigation of the interdimensional hypothesis
  • The classification of Project Stargate (remote viewing) and the Gateway Process (consciousness travel) suggests the government takes seriously the possibility of consciousness interacting with other dimensions — and chose to classify rather than disclose

Differentiating Criteria

CriteriaOther Dimensions / UAP / ReligiousHow Others Differ
Access MethodPassive observation — entities cross into our dimension on their terms. Humans observe via sensors, radar, visual sighting, or historical encounterDMT: human-initiated via substance. Gateway: human-initiated via Hemi-Sync. Bible: God-initiated. NDE: involuntary (clinical death)
Nature of "The Other Side"Physics-based extra dimensions (10-11 per string theory). Entities reside there and can cross the dimensional boundary. Focus on what enters our dimension, not mapping the other side's internal geographyDMT: mapped dimension with specific geometry/entities. Gateway: detailed Focus Level cartography. Bible: heaven/hell. NDE: welcoming light environment
Entity NatureInterdimensional visitors — non-solid (light orbs, plasma), some benevolent, some malevolent. The same beings documented as angels/demons/fairies/aliens across culturesDMT: machine elves, mantis beings. Gateway: Higher Self, consciousness projections. Bible: angels/demons (moral hierarchy). NDE: beings of light
Evidence BaseUAP sensor data (radar, infrared, military encounters), physics theories, religious/mythological texts across cultures, researcher testimonyDMT: clinical trials. Gateway: CIA report. Bible: scripture. NDE: hospital studies
CosmologyPhysics-based multiverse — extra dimensions exist as features of reality's structure. No inherent purpose or moral framework — it's physics, not theologyGateway: consciousness simulator with purpose. Bible: God's creation with moral order. DMT: no cosmology. NDE: minimal
PerspectiveExternal observation — what crosses into our worldDMT: internal experience — what consciousness accesses. Gateway: internal cartography — mapping the territory. Bible: theological interpretation. NDE: involuntary internal experience
Government InterestAATIP, AAWSAP, Skinwalker Ranch investigation. Most directly connected to UAP disclosure programsGateway: CIA Gateway Process. DMT: MKUltra. Bible: institutional control. NDE: minimal
Religious ConnectionCentral — proposes that religion IS early documentation of interdimensional contact. Angels = benevolent entities. Demons = malevolent entities. Ezekiel's wheel = UAPBible: religion is divinely revealed truth. DMT: Strassman's theoneurological bridge. Gateway: reframes religion through Monroe's map. NDE: NDE features overlap with religious descriptions
RepeatabilityNot controllable — entities cross when they choose. Can only observe, not summonDMT: highly repeatable. Gateway: highly repeatable. Bible: not repeatable. NDE: not by choice
Key Unanswered QuestionWhat are the entities, and why do they interact with us?DMT: what is the dimension? Gateway: is the simulator real? Bible: which religion is correct? NDE: is consciousness non-local?

See Also

Other Coverage Worth Reading

  • RedPandaKoala: Independent UFO/UAP documentary filmmaker and researcher who synthesizes historical UFO case files, government secrecy, consciousness-contact phenomena, and high-strangeness...
  • OBE / Astral Projection: Out-of-body experiences (OBEs) — the phenomenon where consciousness appears to separate from the physical body and perceive, travel...
  • Book: The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America
  • Higher Self / I-There: The concept that each human consciousness is a fragment or projection of a larger consciousness entity — called...

Sources

This information was built by Grok and Claude AI research.