Bryan Starbuck's Thesis (Part 2)

Call this Bryan Starbuck's Thesis:

There's a term called Loosh. This ends up being something that happens to humans. That some external dimension or entities beyond our dimension tend to value. It is something that builds up. It may be something that's more human, a certain category that they value. It might be a resource that they get out of it. It might be something that's either pain or unethical behavior humans choose to do, and that creates this unit of substance that they end up valuing and finding as a resource to hoard. It may be agnostic of ethics, but it may well be a measure of something done that's unethical or evil, and that they take away. That them valuing that and inducing that to occur in a bigger quantity may be more satanic, in the sense that it is bad intentioned and unethical.

It may well be that, at some degree, there are external entities. They set up or encourage humans to do more unethical or hurtful things or go through more fear than the norm. It may well cause humans to create more Loosh than they would by themselves. That's increasing the quantity the external entities value.

There are things where, when Jimmy Carter was informed, he cried at how bad it is. The Bush administration had people assessed to disclose, and they decided not to because it was so horrible. Recently, that's occurred where Congress members have been informed and they thought about how bad it is. Another one was an energy secretary just brought in and appointed to that position. They were debriefed for weeks underground in rural Virginia, and then they went through crying every night to sleep. These things may imply that external entities want to encourage more bad things to occur because of whatever agenda. Everything keeps leaning back to that being a real thing. Loosh might well be several things that keep coming back to that. There might be a corollary that might well reinforce that Loosh might be real, and it may be linked to this negativity.

A separate thing tends to be where humans get into a negativity period. It might be where certain ones cause damage to others. Think of all the prisons full of people. There are serial killers. There are also rapists. They may not just do sex crimes but also go out of their way to torture their victims and things like that.

There's a number of things that may well be satanic linked that may well be correlated to the Loosh Above. Those right there are really human A doing damage to human B. Then, separately from that, there is another category which I call Destructive Entropy. This is where people can go do self-sabotaging behavior. If you assume citizens have their set of positive values, logically humans should be taking and carrying out actions that are being measured towards advancing the positive values that they have. Philosophy and psychology have kept coming back to a range of humans often doing self-sabotaging and destructive to their values types of behaviors. Some of that might be past trauma, causing more problems in their life. There's been other philosophy terms about that. Some of it could end up being people creating drama among others just because they feed off of the negative drama part of it. Some of it is because they're bored; they want to be entertained, so they'll do negative and self-destructive things. Think of partying getting out of hand and doing destructive things to themselves and others, just out of trying to deviate from boredom. That stuff could be elevated by external entities and their values were trying to pull out Loosh by humans increasing the quantity of this behavior.

The next and third category of this period could end up being just negativity, anxiety, fear, depression. Think about how many people have depression. How many people committed suicide? How many people are on anxiety medicines? A lot of times people are fearing things that logically humans shouldn't fear in the safe environments they live in. There may not be justification for those numbers of suicides and/or depression.

So this comes back down to me going by Bryan's thesis, and here is the corollary. Think of a vector with a number of dimensions. Each one of those is an axis polarity, going to one dimension, one direction or the other, and having a center point. We'll talk about the different dimensions. A number of these are ethical, progressively ethical towards one direction and unethical in the other direction.

One dimension could be one where it's unethical towards themselves. Maybe somebody is doing prostitution in a way that is self-destructive. Another one might be unethical towards other people, torturing other people; there is no other justification for why to do that. Other ones might be agnostic of ethics but more constructive or destructive towards their values in their life advancing. Maybe it's a matter of having affairs when they have no reason to do that and it destroys their life in a big way. In those cases they're self-destructive, in practical terms.

If you can think of a number of these different dimensions, citizens as logical people and looking to advance in comfort and in living a better life in the future, they would tend to take all these actions they carry out, deciding their decisions and actions they carry out day in and day out, hour in and hour out, and they should end up being towards a positive vector in some or many of those dimensions in what they assess towards their each decision and each action.

Logically, those would all be positives, but when we go look at when people make decisions and actions that are actually advancing their vector towards the negative side of one or more dimensions, then that ends up becoming a fluke of nature. The question ends up being: if that doesn't come from logic, it doesn't come from people getting to a better place in life, then where does it come from? That, where it comes from, is a variable we must solve for. There's a chance that some of it may well come from what we're finding might be outside of our normal dimension that we live in. It might be a bad actor. Maybe they're getting looshed out of it. I want to separate out the science study of people going negative in the dimensions that they carry out into two halves:

1. One half could be encouraged by external entities towards whatever goals they have.
2. The other half ends up being from any other category than that. It might come from mental illness. It might come from humans having a lack of knowledge. It might come from humans getting bored. It might come from any other kind of category. The study of both these two sides is important in case we can logically find and deduce ones of entities outside of our space.