Skip to main content

< Back to Consciousness & Deep State | Main Deep State Project

OMApproach (Open Minded Approach)

X/Twitter thought leader connecting the CIA's Gateway Process with ancient spiritual traditions, occult knowledge, and UAP phenomena — arguing that remote viewing, ESP, astral projection, and out-of-body experiences are not modern discoveries but recoveries of ancient knowledge that was systematically suppressed by institutions seeking to keep humanity spiritually deprived.

FieldDetails
Full NameNot publicly disclosed
Known As@OMApproach (Open Minded Approach)
RoleConsciousness Researcher / X Thought Leader / Esoteric Analyst
StatusACTIVE
PlatformX (@OMApproach, active since October 2016)
Current AffiliationIndependent researcher and content creator
CategoryConsciousness Explorer / Esoteric Researcher

Assessment: EMERGING (Synthesis / Pattern Analysis)​

OMApproach is a significant voice on X synthesizing multiple threads that are typically discussed in isolation: the CIA's Gateway Process, ancient Gnostic and Eastern spiritual traditions, occult knowledge systems, UAP phenomena, and the deliberate suppression of consciousness research. The account's value to this project lies in its persistent argument that these domains are not separate subjects but fragments of a single suppressed truth — that human consciousness can leave the body, access other dimensions, and interact with non-human intelligences, and that both ancient civilizations and modern intelligence agencies knew this. The account bridges Robert Monroe's Hemi-Sync research, declassified CIA programs, Hindu/Buddhist/Gnostic teachings, and UAP disclosure data into a coherent (if speculative) framework. The evidence base is primarily pattern analysis and synthesis rather than original research, but the connections drawn are substantive and well-sourced from declassified documents and ancient texts.

Core Thesis: Ancient Knowledge Rediscovered and Re-Suppressed​

OMApproach's central argument operates on three interconnected claims:

1. The Gateway Process Is Ancient Knowledge​

The CIA's investigation of Robert Monroe's Gateway Process — documented in Lt. Col. Wayne McDonnell's 1983 Assessment (declassified) — did not discover anything new. Remote viewing, astral projection, out-of-body experiences, and access to non-physical dimensions were practiced by ancient civilizations for millennia. Hindu yogic traditions, Buddhist meditation practices, Egyptian mystery schools, Gnostic Christianity, and indigenous shamanic traditions all describe the same phenomena using different language.

The Gateway Process, in this framework, is a modern technological recovery of ancient capabilities — using binaural-beat audio (Hemi-Sync) to achieve states that monks, yogis, and shamans achieved through decades of practice.

2. The UAP Phenomenon Is Spiritual, Not Technological​

One of OMApproach's most consistent themes is that the UAP phenomenon cannot be understood through a materialist/technological lens alone. As stated in a February 2024 post:

"Oh boy, where do I even begin? This clearly shows that even the insiders can't grasp the UAP problem, even though they are heavily involved. It's because the phenomenon is deceptive and it plays with your emotions. The phenomenon is spiritual, and that's why the UFO study group..." — @OMApproach, X, February 2024

The account distinguishes between two categories of UAPs, drawing on Russian research:

"So, the Russians came to the conclusion that there are two groups of UAPs and occupants: the first one is technological, and the second is a 'plasmoid'-like body of light that radiates with energy. Now, guess which group wants to keep you spiritually deprived and in the..." — @OMApproach, X, February 2024

This distinction between physical/technological UAPs and plasmoid/light-based interdimensional UAPs maps directly onto the Other Dimensions / UAP / Religious thesis documented in this project — non-solid UAPs (light orbs, plasma formations) as entities crossing between dimensions.

3. Ancient Traditions Knew About the Spiritual Battle​

OMApproach consistently argues that Gnostic, Hindu, and Buddhist traditions encode knowledge about non-human intelligences and interdimensional warfare that modern UAP researchers are only now rediscovering:

"Just so you know, Gnostic teachings are in perfect alignment with the ancient Hindu and Buddhist teachings. The ancients knew a lot more about the UAP phenomenon and the spiritual aspect, or the spiritual battle to keep us spiritually deprived. The Demon of Impermanence is the..." — @OMApproach, X, December 2023

This positions the UAP phenomenon not as a modern mystery but as an ancient one — with implications that the "spiritual battle" described in religious texts is a literal description of interdimensional conflict rather than metaphorical theology.

The Gateway-Occult-Fear Crossover​

A distinctive element of OMApproach's content is the exploration of fear as a central mechanism in both Gateway Process experiences and occult/spiritual traditions.

Fear as Gatekeeper​

The Gateway Consciousness Simulator framework documents how fear functions as a barrier at multiple levels of consciousness exploration. Monroe himself described fear as the primary obstacle to out-of-body travel. OMApproach extends this to argue that:

  • Fear is not incidental but engineered — both by non-physical entities and by institutional systems
  • Ancient mystery schools taught methods to overcome fear as a prerequisite to spiritual advancement
  • The occult traditions that modern society dismisses as "dark" were often practical manuals for navigating fear-based barriers to expanded consciousness
  • Intelligence agencies that investigated Gateway encountered the same fear barriers and may have weaponized them

Occult Knowledge as Suppressed Science​

OMApproach reframes "occult" (literally "hidden") knowledge not as superstition but as pre-scientific documentation of consciousness phenomena:

  • Astral projection — documented in Egyptian, Tibetan, and Hindu traditions thousands of years before Robert Monroe
  • Remote viewing — practiced by oracles, seers, and shamans across every ancient culture
  • ESP / telepathy — described in Buddhist and yogic traditions as natural byproducts of advanced meditation
  • Entity contact — the core practice of shamanism, mediumship, and ceremonial magic across all cultures

The argument is that these capabilities were known, practiced, and taught in ancient civilizations — then systematically suppressed by institutional religion (which wanted a monopoly on spiritual access) and later by materialist science (which denied the phenomena existed). The CIA's investigation of Gateway and Stargate represents a modern institutional recovery of what was always known.

The Pineal Gland and Spiritual Perception​

OMApproach discusses the pineal gland as a bridge between neuroscience and spiritual tradition:

"The pineal gland develops from the same embryonic tissue as the retina. The human pineal gland retains remnants of light-receptor structures, and it still reacts to light cycles indirectly, helping synchronize the body's circadian rhythm. The legend says that through spiritual..." — @OMApproach, X, 2025

This connects to:

  • The "third eye" concept across Hindu, Buddhist, and Egyptian traditions
  • Rick Strassman's hypothesis that the pineal gland produces endogenous DMT
  • The Gateway Process's use of binaural beats to alter brain states, potentially including pineal activation
  • Ancient practices (fasting, meditation, darkness retreats) that may stimulate pineal function

MJ-12, Spiritual Disclosure, and Prophetic Themes​

OMApproach engages with leaked intelligence documents and prophetic/biblical themes:

"If we read between the lines and the deception within the highest places, in my opinion, you can find the spiritual disclosure here, albeit covered with a lot of unintentional deception. The leaked MJ12 document speculates that a book discovered in New Mexico predicts a global..." — @OMApproach, X, March 2024

The account also tracks prophetic timelines and astronomical alignments:

"Bledsoe says that on Easter 2026, the star Regulus will align with the gaze of the Sphinx on the horizon, and something will happen, either a drop of new knowledge, a revelation, Armageddon, or the return of Jesus; he is not sure." — @OMApproach, X, 2025

And connects biblical prophecy to current events:

"All right, this is intriguing to ponder. Are certain events beginning to unfold this year? Revelation 12:1-2: 'And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of...'" — @OMApproach, X, 2024

This thread — connecting declassified intelligence programs, ancient religious prophecy, and UAP phenomena — is characteristic of OMApproach's synthetic methodology. The account treats intelligence documents, religious texts, and experiential reports as complementary data sources rather than separate domains.

Key Themes Across OMApproach's Content​

The Spiritual Deprivation Thesis​

A recurring argument is that non-human entities (or institutional systems serving those entities) actively work to keep humanity "spiritually deprived" — cut off from natural consciousness abilities. This aligns with:

  • Gnostic concepts of the Archons — rulers who trap souls in material reality
  • Monroe's description of "loosh" — emotional energy harvested from humans by non-physical beings
  • The Gateway Process classification — if expanded consciousness is real and was confirmed, why is the public not informed?
  • Ancient Hindu concept of Maya — the illusion that keeps consciousness trapped in material identification

The Deception Layer​

OMApproach repeatedly warns that the UAP phenomenon itself involves deception — entities that manipulate perception, create false narratives, and play with emotions. This echoes Jacques Vallee's "control system" hypothesis and Whitley Strieber's accounts of the Visitors' deceptive communication style.

Two Groups of UAPs​

Drawing on Russian UAP research, OMApproach distinguishes between:

  1. Technological UAPs — physical craft, potentially from other civilizations or breakaway human groups
  2. Plasmoid UAPs — light-based, energy-radiating entities that are interdimensional rather than technological

This distinction is important because it suggests the UAP phenomenon encompasses both nuts-and-bolts craft and interdimensional consciousness phenomena — and that conflating the two has prevented progress in understanding either.

The Counterargument​

On Ancient Knowledge Claims​

  • The argument that ancient civilizations possessed advanced consciousness technology rests on interpretive readings of religious and philosophical texts — the same texts can be read as metaphor, mythology, or pre-scientific speculation rather than documentation of real phenomena
  • There is no direct physical evidence that ancient meditation practices achieved the same states as Gateway Hemi-Sync — the comparison is based on phenomenological similarity, which could reflect common neurological processes rather than shared access to external dimensions
  • "Ancient knowledge" claims are often unfalsifiable and can be projected onto any sufficiently ambiguous historical text

On the Gateway-Occult Connection​

  • The CIA's Gateway Assessment was one analyst's interpretation of Monroe Institute claims — it does not represent confirmed CIA findings or official agency endorsement
  • Occult practices have not been validated by controlled scientific research — ceremonial magic, astral projection manuals, and shamanic practices lack the reproducibility standard required for scientific acceptance
  • The framework risks conflating correlation with causation — similar phenomenological descriptions across cultures may reflect shared neurology, not shared access to external realities

On the Spiritual UAP Thesis​

  • The claim that UAPs are spiritual or interdimensional rather than technological is unfalsifiable with current methods
  • Russian UAP research cited by OMApproach is difficult to verify and may involve its own institutional biases
  • Prophetic and biblical interpretations of current events have a long history of failed predictions
  • The "two groups of UAPs" distinction, while interesting, lacks empirical support beyond anecdotal observation

On Methodology​

  • OMApproach's content is synthesis and pattern analysis, not original research
  • Social media threads are not peer-reviewed and can amplify confirmation bias
  • The account presents a worldview that is internally consistent but largely unfalsifiable
  • Robert Monroe — Creator of Hemi-Sync and the Gateway Process; foundational figure whose work OMApproach builds on and connects to ancient traditions
  • Gateway Consciousness Simulator — The consciousness framework derived from Monroe's work and investigated by the CIA; central to OMApproach's thesis
  • Remote Viewing — The psi discipline OMApproach argues was known to ancient civilizations and rediscovered by modern intelligence agencies
  • OBE / Astral Projection — Out-of-body experiences that OMApproach connects across Gateway, occult, and ancient spiritual traditions
  • Focus Levels — Monroe's mapped states of consciousness that OMApproach connects to ancient spiritual attainment systems
  • Tom Campbell — Physicist whose consciousness-as-primary framework provides scientific grounding for OMApproach's claims
  • Jacques Vallee — Interdimensional hypothesis and "control system" theory that OMApproach extends with ancient spiritual data
  • Whitley Strieber — Experiencer accounts of deceptive entity contact that parallel OMApproach's warnings about the phenomenon's deceptive nature
  • Other Dimensions / UAP / Religious — The thesis that UAPs are interdimensional and religious accounts document the same phenomenon
  • Non-Local Psi / Information Field — The scientific framework for remote viewing and ESP as non-local consciousness
  • Jordan Crowder — Living practitioner teaching Gateway and remote viewing; embodies the practical application of what OMApproach discusses theoretically
  • Diana Pasulka — Academic researcher documenting UAP-religion intersection from a scholarly perspective

Other Coverage Worth Reading​

  • Book: The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America
  • Book: Mind Wars: Brain Science and the Military in the 21st Century
  • Remote Viewing: The trained ability to perceive distant locations, events, and information using consciousness alone — without physical senses —...
  • Lee Harris: British-born energy intuitive and channeler who communicates with a collective of 88 non-physical beings called "the Z's," transmitting...

Sources​

This information was built by Grok and Claude AI research.